The FED is lying
by Germanico Vaca
I wish I could share the optimism expressed by the Federal Reserve, but the evidence does not support its claims. Fear—not confidence—appears to be the dominant psychological force shaping official narratives today. Institutions are avoiding confrontation with reality because acknowledging it would expose the fragility of the system itself.
The Federal Reserve recently claimed it has neutralized the risk of U.S. default by successfully refinancing approximately $9.4 trillion in maturing debt. On its face, this sounds reassuring. However, when one examines the actual Treasury data, a critical discrepancy emerges: there is no corresponding increase in purchases by traditional foreign sovereign buyers such as China, Japan, or other major reserve-holding nations.
Instead, a significant portion of the debt appears to have been absorbed by entities domiciled in jurisdictions such as the Cayman Islands, Barbados, and similar offshore financial centers. These are not productive economies with surplus savings capable of financing the U.S. government at scale. They are legal and accounting nodes—financial abstractions.
This raises an unavoidable question: who is actually buying the debt?
Circular Finance and Monetary Self-Consumption
What we are observing is not foreign confidence but circular financing. These offshore “buyers” are typically shells for hedge funds, banks, structured vehicles, or custodial entities operating within the U.S.-centric financial system itself. Capital is not flowing into the system; it is being recycled within it, often through leverage, repo markets, and collateral rehypothecation.
Calling this “counterfeiting” may sound provocative, but the functional reality is more precise:
this is self-referential finance—a closed loop in which claims validate other claims without reference to new productive capacity, real savings, or external surplus.
At this stage, monetary instruments no longer represent future production; they represent other monetary instruments.
A Historical Pattern, Not a Novel Event
This phenomenon is not unprecedented. Late-stage empires throughout human history have exhibited similar dynamics. When genuine external capital dries up, systems increasingly rely on legal fictions, accounting innovations, and internal coercion to maintain the appearance of solvency.
Rome debased its currency.
Spain mortgaged future silver shipments.
Britain relied on imperial extraction long after domestic productivity peaked.
The modern version is more technologically sophisticated, but structurally identical: financial abstraction replaces real growth.
The Core Problem: Claims vs. Physical Reality
The fundamental issue is not political mismanagement but a structural divergence between financial claims and physical reality.
The total claims on future production—debt, derivatives, pensions, guarantees—now exceed what the real economy could plausibly produce by orders of magnitude. When this gap widens beyond a certain threshold, the system cannot be stabilized through reform. It can only be postponed through illusion.
This is why recognition is delayed. From an individual perspective, denial is rational:
acknowledging the truth would trigger immediate disruption.
Collectively, however, this delay guarantees a more violent correction later.
Cognitive Limits of Expertise
One of the most disturbing aspects of the current moment is that many economists and financial specialists cannot see the contradiction, not because they lack intelligence, but because they operate entirely within the conceptual framework of the system itself.
They model liquidity, not solvency.
They measure confidence, not physical capacity.
They optimize abstractions detached from material constraints.
This represents a deeper cognitive limitation in complex societies:
humans can build extraordinarily sophisticated technologies while remaining incapable of designing stable social and financial structures to govern them.
Resource Capture in Late-Stage Systems
Historically, when financial abstraction reaches its limit, systems turn toward resource capture. Legal frameworks—often created long in advance—allow extraordinary appropriation under emergency conditions: war, sanctions, national security threats.
Gold becomes central in these moments because it represents one of the few remaining anchors to physical reality in a sea of paper claims.
Whether through sanctions, asset freezes, or emergency powers, late-stage systems increasingly rely on legalized extraction rather than productive growth. This is not primarily driven by ideology or malice but by structural necessity within a failing framework.
The Endgame Constraint
What makes the current transition uniquely dangerous is that humanity has reached planetary limits at the same time it has reached financial abstraction limits. Previous collapses allowed expansion into new territories. That escape valve no longer exists.
Our global financial system requires continuous expansion to remain stable, yet it now operates on a finite planet with declining marginal returns on extraction and productivity.
When real growth becomes impossible, simulated growth and forced appropriation become the only remaining options.
Closing Observation
What we are witnessing is not merely corruption, incompetence, or conspiracy. It is the predictable mechanics of imperial decline, following patterns established repeatedly throughout human history—adapted to modern legal, financial, and technological forms.
The danger lies not in recognizing this pattern, but in refusing to.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario